This is one of the several articles about the John B. Castleman statue that appeared in the May 8 issue of LEO Weekly. To read the rest, go here.
Did you enjoy Derby?
I dont care for the nags myself, but I do take some joy in seeing people all togged up like a frat boys wet dream get a good soaking.
So bitter. I understand you were considered too small to be a jockey.
Your annual joke is about as worn out and unnoticeable as the Derby itself. Listen, bunter, I dont care for bloodsports. I know its not as straightforward as setting a pack of dogs on a deer or a fox, and Im not getting into a debate about it. But its forcing an animal to participate in human entertainment whilst unwittingly putting its life at risk which to me is no different from animals in a circus. And one day, itll go the way of animals in circuses too. Mark my words.
Horses racing against one another is one of the most natural behaviours on Earth, Titch. Besides, you cant say that here, not even in LEO. Racing is the lifeblood of this city. Without it, the economy would collapse, and the place would turn into Detroit in a matter of weeks.
Thats bollocks. Thats like saying college sports are fundamentally important to the economy. Sure, they bring in the wedge, but theyre not critical, and theyre certainly nothing to brag about, particularly compared to the stuff big cities can offer. I appreciate Louisville, but were stuck in the past. We still act as if the Derby makes us special, when, in fact, its a millstone around our neck. If anything, rather than attract growing companies and metropolitan people, I often wonder if it doesnt make them think of Louisville as obstinately parochial.
Thats bound to be a popular opinion. Anyway, I realised as a teenager that Im a rubbish punter, so that limits my own interest in the race itself. I am interested in statues, though.
As your pivots go which I will admit, although childish, are usually one of your few strengths as a writer of low-rent, multi-topic opinion that was piss poor. Do better. But it was super-shocking that Fischer has taken the path of least resistance by trying to forget about Castleman and hoping that everyone else does the same.
It should be torn down. Its not like there are any statues of Charles I in Britain, and rightly so, since he lost the Civil War and, in the process, his head.
I should have known that a Home Counties ponce like you would be ignorant of Londons landmarks, but theres a very large and very prominent statue of Charles I right outside Charing Cross Station.
Well, public transport old bean. Its for the plebs, so naturally not a thing someone of my class would automatically be aware of. So, why is it OK for there to be a statue of the bloke who lost a civil war in London but not on Cherokee Road?
Because the English Civil War was fought by an ethnically homogeneous population over esoteric notions like the divine right of kings, not over owning other humans beings as chattels to be bought and sold based on the colour of their skin. Anyway, I think theres an increasing likelihood that Castleman will stay, and Im OK with that under certain circumstances.
Youre mugging me off, right? One minute youre polishing off your I am Spartacus credentials, the next youre OK with slavers. Although having worked for you, this should not be a shock to me.
Since its one of the few pieces of public art with any sort of historical significance to Louisville, Im OK with it staying, provided its altered to give a broader perspective on who the person actually was. Thats whats being done in some parts of Europe to minimise the fuss over pulling down statues of various dictators commies and fascists all love a statue and it seems an eminently sensible way of doing things. So, keep the statue, but update the plaque to clearly reflect the fact that Castleman was also an enthusiastic pro-slavery bastard.
Compromise, eh? So old fashioned. So out of style. But its so crazy, it just might work.
As you know my philosophy is that we work as a team, and we do things my way. Ergo, since keeping it turns it into a white person issue, Im sure Bevin will happily find money for it in the state budget. If its a black person or a poverty problem, his answer is the same every time.
Prayer?
Yep. Prayer for poor and black folks, money for rich and white folks. Its undeniable: Dying because pharmaceutical companies are flooding markets with opioids? Prayer. Dying because guns are more common now than insects? Prayer. But, want charter schools? Well get you money. Need the state to buy into your private company? Well get you money. And so on.
That gelts going to start rolling in when teachers start coughing up fines. A thousand bucks a pop. Think hes going to do it? Fine individual teachers for the sickout?
No doubt he wants to do it. Risky, politically, but like his adopted daddy in the White House, revenge is a particularly powerful driving force for Bevin. Hes still not used to being defied. Its one of the reasons ex-military officers rarely make good civilian leaders, at least in anything remotely trying to be a democracy, because theyre used to dishing out orders without pushback. Thats not how civilian life works.
Speaking of works, I see hes still listed as chairman of the bell works he inherited somewhere in New England. The one his clearly-self-penned Wikipedia bio omits to mention.
You read his Wikipedia page? Did you run out of colouring books or something?
A moment of boredom one lunchtime. He obviously wrote it himself, or dictated it to some lickspittle. It makes it sound as if he had an impoverished childhood... but then somehow doesnt mention that he inherited a manufacturing business.
Its possible you could own a bell factory and still not be coining it. Demand aint what it once was. But still, worth mentioning.
Well, with a lot of luck hell be off to the knackers yard later this year. That really would be something to get excited about.